🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion state that indecision over how to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.